Check out their
film review site. Just like everyone, they dig
Rushmore, , had serious qualms about the original
Spider-Man, and hated
The Phantom Menace. I love this line from their review of
A.I.:
We are meant to imagine a world upon which global warming and a general ecological crisis have had a devastating impact, causing the deaths of millions of human beings. Since the film does not refer to them, presumably these events had no far-reaching political consequences. Masses of people passively went to their graves apparently sharing the viewpoint of the filmmakers that such a catastrophe was a “natural” and inevitable phenomenon given a society addicted to over-consumption.
But I don't care for their beating on Peter Jackson and
Lord of the Rings:
Tolkien’s mythologised past also gives Jackson a historical licence to create battle scenes in such a way to encourage mindless stereotypes about war and its social causes. This approach, whether intentional or not, dovetails with the contemporary media barrage of evil terrorists and a disinfected version of imperialist war.
...
When measured against Tolkien’s artistry, Jackson’s efforts are rather pale conformist works, which denigrate the restless and complex artistry of the author’s original work.
(via
MetaFilter, which also
reminds us of the time the
Maoist International Movement reviewed everything)
# posted by
Gerry Canavan @ 7:08 PM
|